Optimistic visions ? Or the start of a revolution ?
For a long time now we have debated the so called “housing
crisis” hitting the UK. As an avid outdoor sports enthusiast, these debates
have swayed me from moments of fear, hysteria, to moments of ‘head in sand’.
But as I see the many proposals, almost surrounding the town in which I live, I
wonder what will the future hold. Will I one day have to travel for hours on
end, to find green areas to walk the dog, will I swap my mountain bike for a
cycle machine ? or my kayaking equipment with a rowing machine ? Will my future children only experience the
great outdoors, once a month? once a year ? on a games console ? Watching
wildlife documentary’s ? Or playing football on an AstroTurf.
To understand the
issue, first we need to understand the cause of the problem. The government
have stated that due to the increasing and ageing population, we will need an
increase in housing and set numerous targets for growth. In Cheshire East,
(local to me) 27
000 new homes are planned by 2030, in the East of Cheshire, (Cheshire East core
policy 2013). The housing developers obviously love the ‘free for all’ with the
chance of throwing up cheap housing, and quickly making profits. The council
currently seem to be the ones stuck in a rut, stuck between government target, and the
community.
So
what is this alternative you ask ? well if im honest there’s two. Firstly we
should make sure developers and the council know that we expect sensible,
sustainable growth, with relevant infrastructures. I honestly can’t name one
proposal I have recently seen that offered some sort of infrastructure, for
example shops, schools, community facilities, improved road junctions, or the
widening of connecting roads, green space ( in fact any open space). Why ? why
should councils accept these cheap, quick to build, squashed housing estates.
Surely the council should want proposals for community housing estates, not
just the best way to fit the most houses in one area ?
My
second ‘alternative’ to sitting around, moaning about the ‘housing free for
all’ is to champion green initiatives. Now this alternative is the one that
gets me the most excited. As people, families, friends and communities we
should be coming together. Coming together claiming wasteland, purchasing land,
working with land owners and creating green areas.
Imagine
a field next to your town. The community taking ownership, creates a woodland,
lake, wetland, nature reserve, a park, a green space. Grants from various
trusts, charities and government can help plant trees , DIY store scrapage
schemes enable free wood to build bird houses, mountain bikers could come
together to create mountain biking tracks, local school children could have
classes in weaving, nature studies and natural photography, the community comes
together to manage the green space. A similar social enterprise has been
created In Burslem, with an old church being turned into a rock climbing
centre. Turning an unused building into a hub for outdoor enthusiasts, young
people and people wanting to try out the sport.
What
benefits would this second alternative achieve ? Green, open space for
generations to come. Communities would integrate, work together and have a
central ‘hub’ for the community. Housing developments would be pushed out of
the area, ensuring the town centre keeps some green/open space. Young people
would be able to experience the great outdoors, frequently and easily. Mountain
biking, walking, nature spotting, geocaching all freely available without an added
a car journey. This could easily be followed by other green initiatives, such
as promoting or donating bird feeders to local residents. Creating more
wildlife corridors, encouraging garden owners to try encouraging wildlife into
their garden and spreading a ‘web’ of green space throughout the community.
So
what do you think ? Next time were sat around debating the negativities of the inevitable
increase in housing, should we make some positive progressive points ?
Could
we as individuals, or as communities, make a positive change ? Pressuring councils and housing developers to
make sensible housing construction, quality proposals with an emphasis on quality
! Proper infrastructures, outdoor space and ultimately good quality places to
live. Adding to this should we
think about what we could do ourselves to improve the areas that we live.
Community enterprises, outdoor space, places local to spend time, improve our environment
and basically improve our own well being.
The government National Planning Policy Framework has led to this free for all. The absence of a Local Plan means that we now have developer led planning instead of plan led development.
ReplyDeleteWe could try producing a Sandbach Neighbourhood Plan. This would involve taking difficult decisions about where we wanted development, but it would also meaan that we could demand the infrastructure improvements that we wanted.
I recommend contacting and working with the Sandbach Allotment Society, the Sandbach Woodland and Wildlife Group and local cycling groups. Call me on 01270 753038 if you want contact details.
Cllr Sam Corcoran
Thanks for the reply Sam Corcoran. It seems unbelievable that there is no Sandbach Neighbourhood plan, do you know what date the national planning policy framework was set ? It seems the repercussions of the current house building, with no adequate infrastructures will no doubt affect hundreds of families in the future, and ultimately affect the overall future of the town. Has Cheshire East Council showed any interest in putting together a Sandbach Neighbourhood plan ? It seems wrong that the Council are on the backfoot, being told what and where these developers will build. Overall the council should want positive, sensible plans, and so should want a plan led development.
ReplyDeleteThanks again Sam, I'll look into the groups you've recommended,
First time iv heard of the Woodland and wildlife group.
Thanks
Rob Ellis