Monday, 19 May 2014

The future ‘Gross National Happiness’?


As this blog has progressed I've learnt about, researched and debated various materialist, consumerist issues. Many of these issues have had empty answers, vague and unspecific. But recently iv begun to research the idea of GNH, Gross National Happiness. A concept developed by the Forth king of Bhutan, Bhutan being a small country in the Himalayas. The concept takes concentration away from economic growth and looks at happiness. GNH has four pillars – Good governance, sustainable socio economic development, cultural preservation and finally environmental conservation. Along with this there’s nine points: community vitality, good governance, health, education, time use, cultural diversity, living standards and resilience.


With the yearly survey that Bhutanese people submit, measurements of happiness can be created specifically to gender, districts, age, occupations and more. This can then be brought into government policy, thus increasing the overall nation’s happiness. Every law/policy created in Bhutan has to pass a GNH review, ensuring policies are for the good of the citizens.

According to Guardian Weekly in 2012:
“The country has pledged itself to remain carbon-neutral and to ensure that at least 60% of its land mass will remain under forest cover in perpetuity. It has banned logging and has instigated a monthly pedestrian day that bars all private vehicles from its roads. In a world beset by collapsing financial systems, gross inequity and wide-scale environmental destruction, the tiny Buddhist state’s approach is attracting a lot of interest. Last year the UN adopted Bhutan’s call for a holistic approach to development, a move endorsed by 68 countries. A UN panel is considering ways for Bhutan’s GNH model to be replicated globally.”

 My question I pose is:  should Gross national Happiness be the new measurement of a nations success? Or should we carry on using Gross National Income/ Gross National Product?  What would you rather be a member of, a happy country or a rich country? Although adcourse its very possible that the happier a country's workers, then increased work outputs and even income. 




No comments:

Post a Comment